Tre Tucker vs Jordan Addison dynasty value comparison
Compare Sleeper Agent’s standardized 1QB and Superflex dynasty values, ranks, tiers, age, team context, and production evidence for two nearby WR assets.
100 targets · 56 receptions · 808 yards per 17-game pace
Updated . Public values use Sleeper Agent’s local model and a fixed 12-team PPR baseline.
VALUE GAPS
Where the model currently separates them
Model verdict: Tre Tucker leads this comparison.
Sleeper Agent currently values Tre Tucker 1.0 points higher in the 1QB public baseline.
Sleeper Agent currently values Tre Tucker 1.2 points higher in the SF public baseline.
The age gap is 1.0 years; age is evaluated on the shared WR curve rather than used as a stand-alone verdict.
Both players sit in the Cornerstone tier in 1QB.
Tre Tucker ranks #74 overall in 1QB vs #85 for Jordan Addison.
Both players sit in the Cornerstone tier in Superflex.
Tre Tucker ranks #87 overall in Superflex vs #95 for Jordan Addison.
Tre Tucker is 1.0 years older than Jordan Addison (age 25 vs age 24). Age is evaluated on the shared WR dynasty curve rather than used as a stand-alone verdict.
Jordan Addison has paced 182.2 PPR points per 17 games vs 158.8 for Tre Tucker in the blended production sample.
Jordan Addison draws more receiving volume (100 targets vs 90 per 17-game pace).
Jordan Addison carries a Questionable tag in the current snapshot, which trims the model value.
Tre Tucker: 90 targets · 56 receptions · 729 yards per 17-game pace.
Jordan Addison: 100 targets · 56 receptions · 808 yards per 17-game pace.
League-specific roster construction can change the practical trade decision even when one public baseline is higher.