Woody Marks vs Phil Mafah dynasty value comparison
Compare Sleeper Agent’s standardized 1QB and Superflex dynasty values, ranks, tiers, age, team context, and production evidence for two nearby RB assets.
85 carries · 306 rush yards · 34 receptions per 17-game pace
Updated . Public values use Sleeper Agent’s local model and a fixed 12-team PPR baseline.
VALUE GAPS
Where the model currently separates them
Model verdict: Phil Mafah leads this comparison.
Sleeper Agent currently values Phil Mafah 3.0 points higher in the 1QB public baseline.
Sleeper Agent currently values Phil Mafah 3.0 points higher in the SF public baseline.
The age gap is 2.0 years; age is evaluated on the shared RB curve rather than used as a stand-alone verdict.
Both players sit in the Cornerstone tier in 1QB.
Phil Mafah ranks #93 overall in 1QB vs #116 for Woody Marks.
Both players sit in the Cornerstone tier in Superflex.
Phil Mafah ranks #101 overall in Superflex vs #126 for Woody Marks.
Woody Marks is 2.0 years older than Phil Mafah (age 25 vs age 23). Age is evaluated on the shared RB dynasty curve rather than used as a stand-alone verdict.
Phil Mafah has paced 185.3 PPR points per 17 games vs 142.6 for Woody Marks in the blended production sample.
Woody Marks draws more receiving volume (38 targets vs 34 per 17-game pace).
Woody Marks handles more rushing work (164 carries vs 85 per 17-game pace).